“My goal is to equip people to be able to talk easily about race,” stated Regina Shands Stoltzfus. This was her opening line at the anti-racism training. The training began with Regina Shands Stoltzfus giving brief background information about herself and explaining why anti-racism is important to her. Shands Stoltzfus explained her, “obsession” with this topic, as a result of leaving home for the first time and realizing that most churches were not diverse like the one that she was raised in. She continued the presentation by defining the terms: race, ethnicity, prejudice, and stereotype. Shands Stoltzfus stated that the primary purpose of race is to divide people on a hierarchy. The training continued by watching a short film that was titled, “Danger of a single story.” The video was about an African woman who came to the United States to study; upon her arrival, she faced many people who only had a ‘single-story’ in their mind about where this lady was from and what her life was like. Her roommate assumed that she had grown up in a hut and was experiencing the advanced world for the first time. Regina Shands Stoltzfus immediately had us work at our groups of table as a time of reflection and discussion based on the video. The rest of the training consisted of discussions around the table.
I did not know what to expect from the training, I knew that it would include some discussions but I did not have any specific expectations. The training was really wonderful and time well spent. I have previously heard the term, ‘single-story’ but after watching the video, it hit me at how important this training would be. We are all guilty of only having a ‘single-story’ of a person or situation. The discussions around my table were so intriguing because everyone had a different view and experience with ‘single-story’. It was also really fascinating to hear if racism was talked about with parents while growing up. A new concept that I have never really pondered until the training was segregation represented by where people live. People tend to live in locations with people of their own kind. In the training we discussed how laws often cause the segregation of where we reside.
When hearing the different experiences or times when ‘single-story’ was used by one of the members at my table, many memories rushed to my mind. I am an immigrant. My family is from Argentina, and people often combine all Spanish-speaking countries into one category. In their minds, people relate Argentina to Mexico even though the distance of my home in Pennsylvania is closer to Mexico than Mexico is to Argentina. Throughout my school years, I would hear comments like, “Melina, we should have invited you over because we made homemade tacos last night. You would have loved it.” I also remember my mom getting upset every time she would receive salsa as a gift. Spicy foods are just not our thing. I do not blame people, but they were victims of only having a ‘single-story’.
It is very important to make sure that we do not have a ‘single-story’ of any of our students, whether they are from this country, or what their cultural background may be. We need to make sure that assumptions are not made about our students and colleagues. It is a big danger to only have one story about a person. I want to make sure that I am willing to hear out a person and get a well-rounded understanding of a them or a situation before assumptions are made in my mind.
No comments:
Post a Comment